Rocky Mountain Municipal Airport

Thu Sep 05 2024

The Rocky Mountain Metropolitan Airport (often abbreviated as RMMA) is a general aviation airport located in Broomfield, Colorado, approximately halfway between Denver and Boulder. Originally established to serve general aviation, it has grown over time to become one of the busiest non-commercial airports in Colorado. Its history and expansion have sparked ongoing debates over its impact on surrounding communities, particularly in terms of noise pollution and environmental concerns.

History of Rocky Mountain Metropolitan Airport

- 1920s-1960s: Early Beginnings
The airport, initially known as Jeffco Airport, opened in 1960. It was built to accommodate the growing demand for aviation in the Denver-Boulder metropolitan area. Jeffco Airport primarily served small private planes, flight schools, and general aviation services.

- 1970s-1990s: Gradual Expansion
As the population around the Denver and Boulder regions increased, so did the activity at the airport. During these decades, Jeffco Airport expanded its infrastructure, including building larger runways and upgrading facilities to handle more diverse air traffic, including corporate jets and charter flights.

By the 1990s, the airport was handling a significant volume of traffic, with many local businesses using it for corporate travel due to its proximity to major industrial and commercial centers in the Denver-Boulder corridor.

- 2006: Name Change
In 2006, the airport was renamed Rocky Mountain Metropolitan Airport (RMMA) to reflect its broader role in the region, positioning itself as a key hub for corporate and general aviation in the area.

- 2006-2010: Gradual Growth in Private and Corporate Aviation

In the mid-2000s, RMMA was already recognized as a key airport for private and corporate aviation in the Denver metropolitan area. The airport provided a convenient alternative to Denver International Airport (DIA) for business and private travelers, particularly due to its proximity to business centers in Boulder, Broomfield, and the surrounding areas.

Economic Development: The late 2000s saw moderate growth in corporate aviation, with companies in the technology and aerospace sectors using RMMA for executive travel. The airport’s location, near Colorado’s high-tech corridor, made it attractive for corporate jets and business travel.
Flight Training: RMMA also became a hub for flight training during this time, as several aviation schools based their operations at the airport. The mild weather and open airspace in the region made it an ideal location for pilot training, contributing to a steady increase in air traffic.

- 2010s: Expansion and Increased Air Traffic

Throughout the 2010s, RMMA experienced a notable increase in traffic, largely due to the growing demand for private aviation and flight training. As Colorado’s economy boomed, so did the use of the airport by high-net-worth individuals, corporations, and flight schools.

Private Jet Growth: RMMA became a key hub for private jets, with an increasing number of high-end clients choosing the airport as a base. Many affluent travelers found RMMA more convenient than DIA due to shorter travel times to nearby ski resorts, business centers, and the broader Denver metro area.
Flight Training Surge: The proliferation of flight training schools in the U.S., driven by a claimed shortage of pilots, led to a significant rise in student pilot activity at RMMA. Local flight schools expanded their operations, and the increase in small training aircraft flights became a major source of concern for nearby communities.
Noise Concerns Begin to Escalate: As flight traffic increased, residents in Broomfield, Superior, Westminster, Louisville, and surrounding areas began to raise concerns about noise pollution. While RMMA was not a commercial airport, the constant sound of small aircraft, particularly from touch-and-go operations by flight schools, became a significant issue for those living under flight paths.
Noise complaints during this time were primarily focused on low-flying training aircraft, which frequently flew repetitive circuits around the airport.

Some residents also noted that RMMA's growth was happening without significant regulatory oversight, as general aviation airports are subject to different rules than commercial airports.

- 2019-2021: Significant Growth, Community Backlash, and Noise Complaints

The late 2010s and early 2020s saw a sharp increase in activity at RMMA, driven by a surge in private and corporate aviation as well as a continued rise in flight training operations.

COVID-19 Pandemic Impact: The COVID-19 pandemic had an unexpected impact on RMMA. As commercial air travel declined dramatically in 2020 due to the pandemic, private jet travel increased as wealthy individuals and corporations sought safer, more controlled travel options. RMMA saw an uptick in private jet operations as a result. In addition, the pandemic spurred interest in outdoor recreational activities, with more visitors flying into RMMA to access Colorado’s ski resorts and mountain regions.
Dramatic Increase in Noise Complaints: As flight activity ramped up, noise complaints from nearby residents increased significantly. In 2020 and 2021, the airport received thousands of complaints, with many residents expressing frustration over what they saw as an unchecked increase in flight traffic.
Complaints primarily focused on low-flying flight training aircraft, private jets, and helicopter activity. Residents argued that the noise disrupted their quality of life, particularly in communities like Broomfield and Superior, where rapid residential development had brought homes closer to the airport.
The touch-and-go operations (where training aircraft repeatedly land and take off without stopping) were a major point of contention, as these flights led to constant noise over certain areas.
Noise Task Force Creation: In response to the growing backlash, RMMA and local officials established a Noise Task Force in 2020 to address concerns raised by the community. The task force included representatives from surrounding cities, the airport, and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Its goals were to examine noise mitigation strategies and improve communication between the airport and residents.
One proposed solution was adjusting flight patterns to minimize the impact on residential areas. However, flight patterns are regulated by the FAA, and changing them can be a lengthy and complex process.
Flight Curfews and Restrictions: Many residents began advocating for curfews or restrictions on flight training activity, particularly during early morning and late evening hours. However, because RMMA is a public airport, imposing curfews on general aviation flights is challenging due to federal regulations. General aviation airports typically operate with fewer restrictions compared to commercial airports, which limited the scope of what could be done to address noise.

- 2022-Present: Continuing Growth and Ongoing Challenges

By 2022, RMMA continued to experience growth in private aviation and flight training, further intensifying the conflict between the airport’s economic role and its impact on local communities.

Continued Expansion of Private Aviation: The demand for private jet travel has remained strong, and RMMA continues to serve as a major hub for private and corporate aviation. The airport’s fixed-base operators (FBOs), which provide services like fueling and maintenance for private jets, have expanded to meet growing demand.
In addition to regular private jet traffic, RMMA has hosted high-profile events like the NFL Pro Bowl and the NBA All-Star Game, where private jets fly in and out of the airport, generating further noise concerns.
FAA Involvement: The FAA has been involved in discussions regarding noise mitigation strategies, but results have been so far disappointing.
Environmental and Health Concerns: In addition to noise, nearby residents have raised concerns about the environmental impact of increased aviation activity. Aircraft emissions, particularly from older planes used for flight training, have become a growing issue. Some community members have called for stricter environmental regulations on airports like RMMA, particularly in regard to air quality and pollution from leaded aviation fuel (avgas), which is still used inmost smaller aircrafts.

Key Issues Represented for Nearby Communities

1. Noise Pollution
- Increased Flight Traffic: As RMMA has expanded its operations, including catering to more corporate jets, training flights, and larger aircraft, the volume of air traffic has increased dramatically. Residents in nearby communities such as **Broomfield, Superior, Louisville, and Westminster** have raised concerns about the persistent noise generated by aircraft taking off, landing, and circling the area.

- Training Flights and Circling Patterns: One significant point of contention is the large number of training flights and "touch-and-go" practices, where aircraft repeatedly take off and land. These flights, often conducted by flight schools based at RMMA, lead to noise that affects nearby residential areas, particularly in the evenings and weekends when residents expect quieter conditions.

- Helicopter and Private Jet Activity: Helicopter flights and the growing presence of corporate jets exacerbate the noise pollution. While these flights are important for local businesses and emergency services, their flight paths often take them over densely populated areas, increasing the disturbance.

2. Air Quality and Environmental Concerns
- Aircraft Emissions: With the increase in flight operations, there are also concerns about the environmental impact, particularly in terms of air pollution. The emissions from aircraft, especially older models and smaller planes that often fly at RMMA, contribute to air quality issues in the area. Communities are concerned about the long-term effects of this pollution on public health.

- Proximity to Residential Areas and Open Space: The airport is close to several open spaces and nature reserves, raising concerns about the potential impacts on wildlife and natural habitats. Additionally, residential developments in the area, which have grown rapidly, are now facing the challenges of coexisting with the airport’s operations.

3. Economic Development vs. Quality of Life
- Local Economic Benefits(?): Proponents of the airport argue that RMMA contributes to the local economy. They say that it supports businesses, provides jobs, and attracts corporate clients who use the airport as a convenient alternative to Denver International Airport (DIA).

- Balancing Economic Growth and Livability: However, the quality of life for local residents is at the forefront of the debate. Many communities feel that the economic benefits do not outweigh the constant noise, pollution, and disruptions to their daily lives. Residents have also expressed concerns about the airport’s potential future expansion, fearing that increased traffic will further degrade their quality of life.

4. Community and Political Opposition
- Grassroots Movements: Numerous local grassroots organizations have formed to protest the airport's expansion and to seek tighter regulation of flight patterns, noise levels, and environmental impacts. Groups like Quiet Skies Coalition have emerged to represent the interests of residents affected by the airport’s operations, calling for stricter noise ordinances, alternative flight paths, and better management of air traffic.

- Political Involvement: Local governments, including those of Broomfield, Superior, and Louisville, have become involved in the debate, with some elected officials advocating for stronger regulatory oversight of RMMA. They have called for more transparency from the airport’s management and for policies to mitigate the negative effects of air traffic on local residents.

5. Federal Aviation Regulations and Limits on Local Control
- FAA Jurisdiction: One of the challenges in addressing residents’ concerns is that airports and air traffic in the United States are largely regulated by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). This means that local governments have limited control over flight paths, airspace, and noise regulations. While RMMA’s management has engaged in dialogue with community members, the ultimate authority over flight patterns and operational decisions often rests with the FAA.

- Pressure for Commercial Use: While RMMA currently does not serve commercial airlines, there has been speculation and debate over whether it could be developed to serve commercial flights in the future. This prospect has raised concerns among residents that the airport could further expand and lead to even more significant noise and environmental impacts.

Leaded fuel

The use of leaded fuel at Rocky Mountain Metropolitan Airport (RMMA) is a major issue for both the local community and environmental advocates. RMMA, like many general aviation airports across the United States, still sees significant use of leaded aviation gasoline (avgas), particularly by small piston-engine aircraft. The environmental and health risks associated with leaded fuel have been a growing concern for residents and environmental organizations, as the area around RMMA is experiencing increased development and population growth.

Leaded Aviation Fuel (Avgas) Overview

What is Avgas? Aviation gasoline, or avgas 100LL, is a special type of fuel used primarily by small piston-engine aircraft. Unlike jet fuel used by larger commercial airliners, avgas contains tetraethyllead (TEL) to prevent engine knocking, making it one of the few fuels in widespread use today that still contains lead.
Why Leaded Fuel is Still Used: The primary reason leaded avgas is still in use is the lack of a universally accepted alternative that provides the same engine performance and safety for small aircraft. While leaded gasoline for cars was phased out in the U.S. by the mid-1990s due to its harmful health and environmental effects, aviation fuel has been exempt from these regulations because of concerns that lower-octane alternatives could lead to engine failure in certain types of aircraft.

Environmental and Health Concerns at RMMA

Lead Emissions and Public Health:

Lead Exposure: The use of leaded avgas at RMMA results in emissions of lead into the air, which can settle into nearby soil and water. Lead is a potent neurotoxin, and even small amounts of exposure can lead to significant health issues, especially for children. Lead exposure has been linked to developmental delays, cognitive impairment, and other serious health effects.
Local Community Impact: Communities living near RMMA, including Broomfield, Superior, and Louisville, are particularly concerned about lead emissions, especially as the airport handles a large volume of small aircraft traffic. Residents are worried about potential lead contamination in the air and soil, which could disproportionately affect children and vulnerable populations living near the flight paths of these aircraft.
Recent Studies: Several studies across the U.S. have shown elevated levels of lead in the blood of children living near airports where avgas is used. While no specific studies have been widely publicized regarding RMMA, similar concerns are being voiced by the community, especially given the airport’s high level of training flights and recreational aviation.

Environmental Contamination:

Soil and Water Pollution: Lead from aviation emissions can settle onto nearby land, potentially contaminating soil and water supplies. This is especially concerning for areas around RMMA that are home to parks, recreational spaces, and wildlife habitats. Environmental advocates have raised alarms about the long-term impact of lead deposition on the ecosystem around the airport.
Cumulative Impact with Other Pollutants: Lead emissions add to the broader environmental impact of airport operations, which include noise pollution, emissions from aircraft engines, and other environmental stressors that affect air and water quality in the surrounding region.

Recent Developments

- Increased Demand Post-Pandemic: In recent years, there has been a resurgence in private and corporate aviation activity, particularly after the COVID-19 pandemic, as more travelers have turned to private aviation as a safer and more flexible alternative to commercial flights. This increased demand has put additional pressure on RMMA, both in terms of flight volume and public scrutiny.

- Grassroots Advocacy: Local residents and environmental groups have been pushing for faster adoption of unleaded aviation fuels at RMMA. They argue that, given the known health risks of lead exposure, the airport should prioritize the use of safer, alternative fuels as soon as possible. Advocacy groups have also called for better monitoring of lead emissions in the area and greater transparency regarding the health risks posed by the airport’s operations.

In summary, Rocky Mountain Metropolitan Airport’s growth and development have made it a part of the region's infrastructure, but this has also created significant challenges for surrounding communities. Noise pollution, environmental concerns, and the tension between economic development and livability are at the heart of ongoing debates over the airport’s future.

Leaded fuel

Wikipedia Page

Airport Website

Facebook Page

Airnav Info

FAA Page

Articles Covering Issues and Developments